Anyone who has had the misfortune to drive in the Golden State knows that the average Californian is a lousy, inconsiderate, reckless, and stupid driver. Relatives from out of state mention it without fail. Natives like myself, who choose to go places by bicycle, dodge death on a daily basis, riding like maniacs because experience has taught us that quick reflexes and a certain daredevil attitude are necessary to survival. Meanwhile, in this high-speed jungle, drivers get away with all sorts of mayhem, with few repercussions. Police write plenty of tickets (mostly to generate revenue), but tickets are a mere after-the-fact slap on the wrist, and they don't do the bicyclist spattered all over the sidewalk much good. I say it's high time we implemented a new system to curb reckless driving, and I have, if you'll pardon the pun, just the ticket.
I have mused a number of times that if drivers were as vulnerable as bicyclists--stripped of the comfort and protection of thousands of pounds of steel, airbags, and air conditioning--they would either learn to pay attention very quickly, or they would perish. Either way, problem solved. Since this is not possible to implement until I take over the world, I have had to be content with role-reversal fantasies involving swerving Hummers at pink-faced, panting rednecks and soccer moms frantically pedaling bicycles. But the other day, after witnessing an example of vehicular stupidity, I recalled a movie called The Fifth Element, which introduces Bruce Willis as a reckless cab driver with a scant few points left on his driver's license. This concept of points got my wheels turning (if you'll pardon another pun), which led to the brainwave that birthed my magnificent solution.
However, before I unveil the solution, I have to introduce the problem, and all its various components. The first rule of engagement is to know your enemy, so I will begin with definitions.
DEFINITIONS
You would think that such a diverse state would have a pretty broad spectrum of driving ability, but in all my 21 years here, I've only seen three kinds of drivers: good drivers, average Californian drivers, and the stereotypical Californian drivers who give us all a bad name.
Good drivers are just that--drivers who are competent, sensible, have regard for human life, and obey traffic laws. Sadly, they are the only minority in California who have yet to reproduce themselves to majority status. They account for perhaps 3% of traffic, and can rest assured that they are highly unlikely to find themselves caught in the machinations of my devious solution to California's traffic woes.
Stereotypical Californian drivers are technically a minority, but are far more numerous than good drivers. These are the assholes on whom the stereotype of a terrible driver is based. They do "California stops"1, race each other, weave through traffic, drive drunk or high, speed, drive over sidewalks and lawns2, and otherwise exhibit a reckless disregard for human life. Fortunately, many of them favor extremely loud stereo systems and rap music, so whenever the windows shake and the air becomes polluted with noise, sensible people like myself can go "Shit, bassmobile," and prepare to dodge. Unfortunately, this does not hold true in all cases--not every stereotypical Californian driver bumps rap music, and many average Californian drivers do.3
Average Californian drivers, as you've probably guessed, are those in between the two extremes. They account for about 88% of traffic on the road, and are characterized by their lack of both recklessness (which keeps them from being stereotypical Californian drivers) and intelligence (which keeps them out of the good driver category). They typically are more of a nuisance than a threat to others on the road, but one must keep an eye on them, as their incompetence occasionally proves deadly.
A SEXIST ASIDE
As long as I'm lumping people into arbitrary categories in order to
Men are far more likely to engage in reckless behavior--speeding, street racing, discharging firearms from a moving vehicle, etc. However, they are also more likely to be paying attention to what they're doing, and are more likely to be at least somewhat skilled at handling their vehicles.
Women are far more dangerous than men, because they are less likely to pay attention to what the fuck they're doing. A Californian woman behind the wheel is either a very good or a very bad thing, particularly when that wheel belongs to a truck or other large vehicle. I have had a number of close calls over the years, and the hairiest ones all involved vehicles driven by women--not women speeding, or weaving through traffic, or driving drunk, but women who weren't paying attention.
To recap: Men are more likely to do something stupid, but women are more likely to kill you. Adding insult to injury, they won't even kill you on purpose. Now that I've pissed off the female readers of my blog, I might as well present my solution to California's driving ills.
SOLVING THE PROBLEM OF STUPID DRIVERS
The DMV Driver's Handbook lists some traffic offenses that can result in "points" being deducted from your license. Lose enough points, and you lose your license. Sounds reasonable, right? Probably because it is--but many people aren't reasonable. In the real world, people who rack up enough offenses to get their license taken away often continue driving without a license, until they're finally stopped by surer means, such as jail time or having their car confiscated.
Instead of a system of taking away points, and eventually taking away licenses, I propose the opposite. I propose we give traffic offenders points, and when they accrue a certain number of points, we give them a penalty they'll never forget. My system is as follows:
- Minor traffic violations are worth 1-4 SDP (Stupid Driver Points). Since I can't be bothered to go through the traffic code line by line, I'll let law enforcement do it.
- Speeding is worth x SDP, where x equals the number of miles per hour over the speed limit you were driving. (The points are assigned based on the highest speed the police clocked you at on a radar gun.) Racing tacks on another 1-5 SDP, depending on how busy the street is.
- Driving drunk is worth 10 SDP for each point over the legal limit, as determined by a breathalyzer. If you are intoxicated by some other substance, you get 15 SDP. (These penalties stack, so someone driving drunk and high would get 25 SDP.)
- Texting, doing makeup, or doing any other activity that results in you taking your eyes off of the road while the vehicle is in motion is worth 10 SDP, as well as confiscation of the offending device, if applicable. (Kiss that iPhone or makeup kit goodbye.)
- Discharging a firearm from a moving vehicle (unless you are an active member of law enforcement or the armed forces) carries a penalty of 10 SDP. If you actually hit what you were aiming at, the penalty is lowered to 8 SDP.
Now for the fun part. If you have 50 Stupid Driver Points on your license, a high-priority warrant will be issued for your arrest. Upon being captured, you will be forced to undergo Stupid Driver Rehabilitation, which consists of a nationally televised Gladiator-style demolition derby. You and another 50+ Point idiot will face off in a broken glass littered arena, each of you driving your own car (or an impound, if yours is out of commission) and carrying 1d4 five-gallon tanks of propane in the trunk (the kind you use for barbecues).4 In the event that both cars become disabled, but both drivers are still alive, you will be provided with midieval weaponry, and the competition will continue. Survivors (if any) will have 50 SDP removed from their license, and will be responsible for their own medical bills.
California drivers, not to mention the gene pool, will benefit from this law over time, as stupid drivers are gradually killed off. The state of California will reap a huge profit by televising the Stupid Driver Rehabilitation events. Cocky kids in expensive cars or trucks bought by mommy and daddy will either think twice before putting the pedal to the metal, or will deliberately rack up SDP to test their mettle with Rehabilitation--either way, the problem will be resolved. The only real issue I can see is that such a program would inevitably create a breed of "super-drivers"--those reckless enough to accrue lots of Stupid Driver Points, but skilled enough to survive the Rehabilitation. Most likely, though, these super-drivers would become celebrities in their own right (a la Kable), and would either settle down after raking in a few millions in endorsements and merchandise, or continue to participate in Rehabilitation until their luck ran out.
Either way, California's roads would be a lot safer. And less crowded.
1 A "California stop" is when someone does not come to a complete stop at either a stop sign or a red light. In and of itself, it's not a big deal--the problem is that they tend to punch the gas pedal after slowing without looking to see what might be in their path.
2 I'm not kidding. I've seen this. More than once.
3 On extremely rare occasions, good drivers will blare rap music as well. I suspect this serves as a form of camouflage, which keeps good drivers safe in stereotypical Californian driver territory.

